Carbon equivalent calculator: IIW CE and Pcm for welding steel

Type in the chemistry from a mill test report and get the IIW carbon equivalent and Pcm side by side, with both formulas and every term shown. Then read what a higher number means for weldability and who decides preheat.

Heat analysis (weight percent)

Leave an element blank if the report does not list it; it counts as zero.

Carbon equivalent results

CE (IIW)
0.4113
Pcm (Ito-Bessyo)
0.2755

IIW steps: 0.2 + 1/6 (0.1667) + (0.1 + 0.03 + 0.01)/5 (0.028) + (0.1 + 0.15)/15 (0.0167) = 0.4113.

Pcm steps: 0.2 + 0.25/30 (0.0083) + (1 + 0.15 + 0.1)/20 (0.0625) + 0.1/60 (0.0017) + 0.03/15 (0.002) + 0.01/10 (0.001) + 5 × 0 (0) = 0.2755.

Enter weight percent as printed on the mill test report (0.20 means 0.20%), not a fraction. The two formulas give different numbers for the same steel by design, so never compare an IIW value with a Pcm value.

Studying for CWI Part A? Take the free 10-question check to see exactly which topics to fix first, then close the gaps with the CWI course.

Or read a full free lesson first (no signup).

Studying with a coworker? Send them the free check.

Carbon equivalent formula for welding

Carbon equivalent (CE) folds the alloying elements in a steel into one number, as if they were extra carbon. Every element is a weight percent from the heat analysis, so 0.20% carbon goes in as 0.20.

  • IIW carbon equivalent: CE = C + Mn/6 + (Cr + Mo + V)/5 + (Ni + Cu)/15.
  • Pcm (Ito-Bessyo): Pcm = C + Si/30 + (Mn + Cu + Cr)/20 + Ni/60 + Mo/15 + V/10 + 5B.

The IIW formula is the one most welding courses teach and the one most people mean by "carbon equivalent". Pcm adds silicon and boron and weights the other elements differently, which is why it suits the lower-carbon, microalloyed steels that the IIW formula was not built around. Both formulas are published by TWI and the Australian Welding Institute. Confirm the formula your governing code or WPS names before you rely on a result.

How the calculator works

  1. Copy the weight percent of each element from the mill test report. Carbon is required; leave any element the report does not list blank and it counts as zero.
  2. The tool divides each element by its factor, adds the terms and shows each step, so you can check it against a hand calculation.
  3. Read the two results as separate scales. A Pcm of 0.28 and an IIW CE of 0.41 can describe the same steel.

What a higher carbon equivalent means for weldability

A higher carbon equivalent means the steel hardens more easily as the weld and the heat-affected zone cool. Harder, more brittle microstructure plus hydrogen in the weld plus restraint on the joint is the recipe for hydrogen cracking, and that is the problem carbon equivalent is a shorthand for. The higher the number, the more hardenable the steel, the less forgiving it is, and the more careful the procedure has to be about heat input, cooling rate and hydrogen.

A low number does not mean a steel is safe to weld cold, and a high number does not mean it cannot be welded. It is one input, and it ignores thickness, joint restraint, hydrogen level and process.

Why the code or WPS sets preheat, not a calculator

Preheat slows cooling so hydrogen can escape and the structure stays tougher. How much you need depends on composition, section thickness, the hydrogen level of the process and consumable, restraint and the heat input you run. Codes and procedure qualification records fold those together, and the result is written into the WPS. That is why this page stops at the number: the temperature is set by the document that governs your job, and an inspector checks the work against that document. If you are studying for the CWI exam, the useful skill is knowing which factors push preheat up and where to look it up, not memorizing a temperature.

Worked example 1: a conventional carbon-manganese steel

Heat analysis, in weight percent: C 0.20, Si 0.25, Mn 1.00, Cr 0.10, Mo 0.03, V 0.01, Ni 0.10, Cu 0.15, B 0.

  • IIW: 0.20 + 1.00/6 + (0.10 + 0.03 + 0.01)/5 + (0.10 + 0.15)/15 = 0.20 + 0.1667 + 0.0280 + 0.0167 = 0.4113.
  • Pcm: 0.20 + 0.25/30 + (1.00 + 0.15 + 0.10)/20 + 0.10/60 + 0.03/15 + 0.01/10 + 0 = 0.20 + 0.0083 + 0.0625 + 0.0017 + 0.0020 + 0.0010 = 0.2755.

Manganese is the biggest contributor after carbon, which is typical for this kind of steel.

Worked example 2: a low-carbon microalloyed steel

Heat analysis, in weight percent: C 0.08, Si 0.30, Mn 1.40, Cr 0.03, Mo 0.01, V 0.04, Ni 0.03, Cu 0.02, B 0.0005.

  • IIW: 0.08 + 1.40/6 + (0.03 + 0.01 + 0.04)/5 + (0.03 + 0.02)/15 = 0.08 + 0.2333 + 0.0160 + 0.0033 = 0.3327.
  • Pcm: 0.08 + 0.30/30 + (1.40 + 0.02 + 0.03)/20 + 0.03/60 + 0.01/15 + 0.04/10 + 5 × 0.0005 = 0.08 + 0.0100 + 0.0725 + 0.0005 + 0.0007 + 0.0040 + 0.0025 = 0.1702.

Notice that boron is tiny in weight but is multiplied by 5 in Pcm, so a few thousandths of a percent still count. These are original made-up analyses for practice, not data from a real heat or an exam.

Carbon equivalent questions candidates ask

What is the difference between IIW carbon equivalent and Pcm?

They are two scales for the same idea. IIW uses carbon, manganese, chromium, molybdenum, vanadium, nickel and copper. Pcm also counts silicon and boron and uses different divisors, so its numbers run lower for the same steel. Use the formula your code or WPS names and never compare one scale against the other.

What carbon equivalent is too high to weld without preheat?

There is no single number to memorize. Whether a steel needs preheat, and how much, depends on composition together with thickness, hydrogen level, restraint and heat input. The governing code and your WPS set it, so read the preheat requirement there for the job in front of you.

Do I need to memorize the carbon equivalent formula for the CWI exam?

Part A is closed book, and metallurgy and welding-related calculations are both Part A content areas. Carbon equivalent sits where the two meet, so know the IIW formula and what a higher result means. The CWI Part A exam guide shows where the points are, and the CWI math calculator drills the rest of the Part A arithmetic.

Work the IIW carbon equivalent and Pcm from a heat analysis, with every term shown. A calculation aid; the governing code and the WPS set preheat for real work.

Try one free question

Try one question

Question 1 of the free 10-question check on CWI Part A. No signup. Then ask Tack, the AI study buddy, why the answer is right and the others are wrong.

Question 1 of 10 · free checkUntimed

NDE Fundamentals

Magnetic particle testing can be used on which of these materials?

Press A–D or 1–4 to choose an answer while this question is on screen.

Choose an answer to begin

Email me the free CWI Part A exam-day kit

What to bring, arriving and the testing room, plus the booking steps, from the exam body's own candidate guide. Sent to your inbox.

Ask Tack before you buy AI your Fillet Gauge study buddy

See what's on the CWI Part A exam, test yourself with 5 quick questions, or find the plan that fits you.

Terms this tool uses

Published references

From the blog

Practice CWI Part A fundamentals

You just turned a heat analysis into IIW CE and Pcm and saw why a higher number raises the cracking risk. Part A puts that metallurgy next to welding processes, NDE and calculations. The free 10-question check scores you by topic in minutes, no signup. The CWI course drills your weak spots and explains every answer.

Take the free 10-question CWI Part A check

The CWI Part A course

Available now · instant access

The CWI Part A course

  • 10modules of lessonsEvery task on the outline
  • 2full-length timed exams165 questions in 135 minutes each
  • 704practice questionsEach one explained
  • 5worked calculationsStep by step
  • 1week-by-week study planSet to your exam date

Turn a practice answer into a study step. In untimed practice, ask Tack AI about any question you answer, follow up, then see your weakest topics and what to drill next.

Part A course$99

Terms and refunds · Secure checkout by Stripe · Billed by Nori Software

See the course

Compare plans

Every answer comes with a full explanation.

By the Fillet Gauge editorial team. Report an error.

Add this calculator to your site

Copy this HTML with its attribution link. The frame scrolls to include the calculator and explanations; no external script is needed.